The Frederick Douglass Papers / Connections
A correspondent in the letters index

Rosine Amé-Draz

Letters sent or received, and mentions in the folders containing them.

21 letters, sent or received · 37 places · 3 correspondents

Places mentioned in the same folders

These folders contain this correspondent's letters and a mention of the indexed term. This does not mean the correspondent's own letter mentions it.

Order is “distinctive first” above the reviewed floor of 5 records, then by count. 16 of 37 places meet the reviewed floor.

37 places

PlaceFoldersYears
Bournemouth Hampshire61864–1873
Glasgow61861–1887
Bristol81863–1887
Worcester51861–1873
Bridport91864–1887
Manchester51863–1877
Providence71864–1887
Rochester101861–1877
Show all 37 placesShow fewer places
PlaceFoldersYears
London81861–1887
Paris51867–1887
Baltimore61864–1873
New York111861–1887
Philadelphia81861–1875
Chicago71864–1877
Boston81861–1877
Washington101863–1887
Edinburgh41861–1887
Liverpool41863–1887
Newcastle41864–1887
Peterboro41863–1875
Cleveland31865–1887
Anacostia21887
Brooklyn21875–1887
Cedar Hill21887
Denver21868–1873
Dublin21877–1887
New Bedford21863
Rome21873–1887
Syracuse21863–1864
Belfast11877
Detroit11873
Haiti11877
Hartford11864
Hoboken11877
Indianapolis11868
Lynn11863
New Haven11875

Corresponded with

Letters between these two correspondents, counted only when both sender and recipient were read from the letter itself. This does not imply agreement or affinity.

Shared letters divided by the smaller of the two correspondents' totals of letters sent and received. 0 of 3 correspondents meet the floor of 5 letters. Those rows are ordered by overlap, then count, then name; rows below the floor follow by count, then name.

3 correspondents

PersonLetters betweenYears
Douglass (surname only, unresolved) 21877–1887
Mrs Crofts as printed11863
Rosa as printed11867
About this index

Dataset and reviewed rules

Tier 1: derived from the published letters index, the reviewed correspondent groups and the reviewed place list by the rules below — no inference, no model. Post-fold (sitting 2026-09-05): 169 reviewed correspondent groups; 2090 printed forms remain groups of one below the review floor, disclosed. Corpus version 5db27b8755bd; 170 records. Weighting constants: PROVISIONAL — the EC sitting's constants (2026-08-30) reused pending the Douglass correspondence sitting; changed only by a sitting. raw count everywhere — the count is the fact; ordering is presentation.

Identities: 172 of the 2,262 names in this layer are reviewed groupings. A name marked “as printed” is a form no ruling has reached — it may be one person, several, or part of another identity; an unmarked name is a reviewed identity.

Names and terms in the same records

Rule: vocabulary term (aliases OR-folded) × correspondent, FOLDER-level co-occurrence: the term's whole-word hit on a folder text × the person's letters in that folder — never letter-level (letter boundaries are not delimited beyond the anchors)

Order: distinctive first (lift)records * N / (deg_term * deg_person); N = total fts records; degrees = graph_term_records / graph_person_records counts; support floor 5.

On this page: Order is “distinctive first” above the reviewed floor of 5 records, then by count.

SELECT t.slug FROM graph_term_records t JOIN graph_person_records p ON p.slug = t.slug WHERE t.term = :term AND p.person = :person ORDER BY t.slug

Corresponded with

Rule: letters carrying both parties (the boundary sentence), grouped by the unordered pair of correspondent groups; see the builder A correspondence is counted only where both a sender and a recipient were read from the letter itself; letters with one party read are in no edge.

Correspondence weighting: Shared letters divided by the smaller of the two correspondents' totals of letters sent and received. Support floor 5. provisional; the EC alongside floor reused as the correspondence floor.

SELECT id FROM letters WHERE (sender_group = :person_a AND recipient_group = :person_b) OR (sender_group = :person_b AND recipient_group = :person_a) ORDER BY year, id

How these results are ranked

Distinctiveness (lift) compares how often a term and a name share records with the frequency expected from their separate record totals. It is not evidence of personal interest or influence.

PlaceDistinctiveness
Bournemouth Hampshire15.5×
Glasgow3.9×
Bristol3.4×
Worcester3.1×
Bridport2.8×
Manchester2.2×
Providence1.8×
Rochester1.4×
London1.4×
Paris1.3×
Baltimore1.3×
New York1.1×
Philadelphia1.1×
Chicago1.0×
Boston1.0×
Washington1.0×
Edinburgh2.6×
Liverpool1.8×
Newcastle1.5×
Peterboro4.8×
Cleveland0.9×
Anacostia0.4×
Brooklyn0.6×
Cedar Hill0.4×
Denver0.8×
Dublin1.1×
New Bedford1.1×
Rome1.1×
Syracuse1.1×
Belfast1.3×
Detroit0.4×
Haiti0.3×
Hartford0.6×
Hoboken1.1×
Indianapolis0.6×
Lynn0.6×
New Haven0.7×

Corresponded with: ranking and measures

Shared letters divided by the smaller of the two correspondents' totals of letters sent and received. This is the overlap coefficient, shown as a percentage.

PersonOf the smaller correspondence
Douglass (surname only, unresolved)10%
Mrs Crofts100%
Rosa13%